Tuesday, October 9, 2012


Kania, Kassandra. http://www.cleanlink.com/hs/article/Feminine-Hygiene-Products-A-Convenient-Truth--13000. 18 April 2011. 4 October 2012.
This webpage discusses the some of the issues surrounding the installation of feminine hygiene dispensers.  Firstly, it is considered a convenience item, but in areas accessed by the public dispensers can turn a profit.  Other concerns involve theft, product preference, restocking.  With this it may be more cost effective if the products are made available free of charge.  Sanitation and cross contamination are brought up as issues to be addressed by custodial staff, but it should be noted that they already deal with this since there are women’s restrooms on campus.  It is also mentioned that it is quite important to make an effort to survey the women that will be using the products.  This site appears that it presents information objectively and is obviously working with the industry.  I think that is does, like most of the other sources I found, support making these products available freely.

Stryker, Jeff, Sarah E. Samuels and Mark D. Smith. "Condom Availabilityin Schools: The Need for Improved Program Evaluations." American Journal of Public Health (1994): 1901-1906.
While this is a dated article and focuses on the distribution of condoms in secondary schools, there is data that supports that students run in to resistance and obstacles when attempting to acquire condoms.  The article also mentions that some schools may be able to qualify for funding from the state.  This may or may not apply within our state, Georgia, and it may not apply to universities, but it provides an option to consider.  Importantly, it mentions that it is difficult to measure whether or not the distribution of condoms in schools impact the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy and hopefully newer research available.   This source is a an authority since it is a major medical journal.  It provides relevant information and presents additional questions that should be addressed. 

Yi, Joon. http://dailyuw.com/news/2011/oct/24/waiting-tampons/. 23 October 2011. 4 October 2012.
This article discusses the problems encountered at The University of Washington by women that utilized feminine hygiene product dispensers as well as those that are working on making sure that the dispensers are maintained.  The reasons provided physical plant staff include theft, vandalism, cost, and maintenance and repair.  It does appear that finding a restroom on this campus that has a working, stocked dispenser is quite difficult and this is a problem on this campus.  It also important for physical plant staff to maintain a list of dispensers and actually maintain them and that there is still a need for more dispensers on campus.  This article presents both sides of the issue by informing us of the position of the physical plant staff and some of the women on campus.  This will be helpful when considering how to approach the administration and physical plant staff.

Friday, September 21, 2012


Gender inequality at Surrey Center resides in the shops that are there.  It seems that while there are shops that are there for professional men’s dress, there is a great deal of leisure or recreation type stores for men.  The stores that directed towards women include stereotypical things like shoes, wedding dresses, tanning, a specialized fitness studio, antiques, and jewelry.  This means that inequality is taking place in the items and services that are directed and made available to people.  If the items that are available and directed at men are work or leisure oriented and those for women are personal work (fitness and tanning), antiques, jewelry, and shoes there is a difference in the message being sent to these two types of gender.  There are things that are appropriate for men to be involved or interested in and there are activities that are appropriate for women to be interested in.  Men’s activities are professional work and leisure when they are not making money.  Women are to be aesthetically pleasing, work on their body, be interested in jewelry, and focus on the home.  At Surrey Center there does not appear to be much in the way of people not taking the paths of least resistance.  It does seem to be a destination for shopping and dining that reinforces and rewards those that do take the path of least resistance.  I am not able to speak of all the people that spend their money there, but the majority of people appear to be established, well off, or wealthy and interested in things that those classes of people are interested in.  The employees of those businesses may be different though.  The people that I have know that do or have worked there do tend to have different ideas of how society should be structured and do not take the path of least resistance in many aspects of their lives, but they do choose to do so when they are at work due to the requirement that they earn a living and their choices have been limited in some ways and sometimes because they do not choose to take the path of least resistance.  I am at a loss as to how to fight gender inequality at Surrey Center.  This is mainly because it is in some ways a landmark and a destination in Augusta.  It caters to people that are for  the most part not interested in changing the way race, class, and gender are influential in our lives.

The location that I chose for the Social Location Project for WMST 1101 Introduction to Women’s Studies is Surrey Center.  Surrey Center is a shopping center located at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Wheeler Road in Augusta, Georgia.  The way that I identify with this shopping center is as a consumer.  I do enjoy eating at one of the restaurants that is located there as well as a chain clothing store that I purchase clothes from online and I use the brick and mortar store to return items that I do not wish to keep.  I do not personally identify with this location very well besides being a consumer at those two businesses that I patronize and my role in this location is limited to that which occurs only a couple of times a year.  The only power in this location would be the ability to decide whether or not I will spend money there.  This is definitely very limited in that the amount I spent there is much less than what many of their regular customers could demand or request.

This photo represents the social construction of gender.  Lorber explains that explains that gender is a process, something that we do, and allows us to organize behavior and expectations. She also provides a term and definition of how this image relates to the social construction of gender.  Gender display is the “presentation of self as a certain kind of gendered person through dress, cosmetics, adornments, and permanent and revisable body markers” (31).  This image like the rest in this blog was taken in Surrey Center.  This image, in particular, is of part of the Talbot’s exterior signage and also Shoes at Surrey.  These are two of the many stores at Surrey Center that specifically target women as their consumer base while other stores, a few of them have men as their target consumer group.  There is a definite division between what these stores and their customers deem appropriate clothing for men to wear while there is a separate definition of what is socially acceptable for women to wear.  This division reinforces the social construction of gender, which has already been established, through the models in the windows and within the store.  It is also quite possible that when a customer that enters the store and is not of the socially prescribed gender for these stores interacts with the employees they are expected to purchase the clothing for someone else.  I would imagine that within this specific shopping center that customers that do not make it clear that they are purchasing for someone else or if they try clothes on that are assigned to a different gender they are met with resistance, appall, or some other negative reaction.
   
This photograph represents privilege.  Ferber et al. have privilege in the glossary as “The systematic access to valued cultural and institutional resources that are denied to others, based on social location in dominant categories of race, gender, sexuality, ability, and so forth.  Privilege exists in relation to oppression” (556).  It is a picture of the store “Gentry”.  Merriam-webster.com defines gentry as “a : upper or ruling class : aristocracy b : a class whose members are entitled to bear a coat of arms though not of noble rank; especially : the landed proprietors having such status”.  While this may not play directly into how Peggy McIntosh approaches privilege, I think that this type of privilege is more observable and plays a greater role in our daily lives than something that is hidden and may unrecognizable for most people even if they try to find it.  This is privilege because there is store that is referencing something of a bygone era and seems to present the idea that the people that shop there are in a position to rule or feel superior because of where they shop.  While there may be some customers that are not white and wealthy, it is easy to accurately assume that most of their customers are.   
  

This image represents heteronormativity.  It is as picture of “House of the Bride” which is in the same area as Surrey Center, but kind of behind it with a connected parking lot.  Martin and Kazyak explain that “Heteronormativity structures social life so that heterosexuality is always assumed, expected, ordinary, and privileged” (316) and also that it “holds people accountable to reproductive procreative sexuality and traditional gendered domestic arrangements of sexual relationships, and it is linked to particular patterns of consumerism and consumption” (317).  So, a store that specializes in bridal apparel and special occasion dresses is a product of and reinforces heteronormativity.  Yes, it is quite possible that someone other than a heterosexual woman that is marrying a heterosexual man is shopping for a dress at this store, but that is probably not their target consumer group.  This is a store that is rewarding (not the best word, but it fits) heterosexual behavior in women by providing them with the opportunity to look or feel like they are trained to through the social construction of gender which is reinforced by media. 
This is a picture of the Surrey Center Sign on Highland Avenue.  I used this photo to represent intersectionality.  Intersectionality is “an ‘analysis claiming that systems of race, social class, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, nation, and age form mutually constructing features of social organization, which shape Black women’s experiences and, in turn, are shaped by Black women’” (Johnson, Lorber, Collins PowerPoint).  This image represents intersectionality because of the area surrounding Surrey center as well as the people that work there.  Surrey Center is presented as an upscale shopping center and mainly caters to white middle to upper class customers.  The neighborhoods that are around the shopping center are predominately black and appears to be economically depressed with predominately white middle-upper class neighborhoods just past that.  The employees in the stores and restaurants usually have white employees upfront or serving with the lower level service employees that do not directly interact with customers being another race or appearing to be of a lower socio-economic group.  I think this relates to intersectionality because Collins argues that it is how class, race, and gender interact and impact our lives as individuals and groups that must be considered.  This is relevant if we consider how class, race, and gender come into play when we examine what groups of people frequent certain establishments or shopping areas while also looking at who is working there and in what capacity.      
This is an image that represents patriarchy.  It is a photograph of the store Rivers and Glen.  Johnson explains that “Patriarchy’s defining elements are its male-dominated, male-identified, and male-centered character” (84) and “is a set of symbols and ideas that make up a culture embodied by everything from the content of everyday conversation to literature and film” (84).  Ferber et al. defines patriarchy as “a dynamic system of power and inequality that privileges men and boys over women and girls in social interactions and institutions” (556).  This photo represents patriarchy in that it is a store that seems to play into the idea that men fish and it is appropriate for them to dress in a way that expresses that they do or have an interest in it and this is not really extended to women.  Also, in relation to the other stores located in Surrey Center, this is a store for men that seems to express the idea of leisure, recreation, and comfort for men while the other stores do not express that same idea for women.  While the clothing that is sold to and directed at women may be comfortable and appropriate for leisure, it does not seem to project that idea.  There is a lingerie store, a fitness store, a tanning salon, and several others that sell tight clothes, clothes that restrict movement, and express the idea that women must work to be attractive while men are able to relax.  I did try to complete this project at the local mall, but I was unable to find a store that was directed at men besides shoes and hats while there was an abundance of lingerie, jewelry, and shoe stores.  
This is an image of both Oxygen Fitness Studio and Palm Beach Tan.  It is used to represent taking the path of least resistance.  Refusing to take the path of least resistance was the term provided to capture, describe, and explain, but I was unable to achieve that at Surrey Center since Surrey Center is or at least appears to be a shopping and dining destination that rewards taking the path of least resistance.  Johnson explains that soldiers “want to do nothing more than to do what they think is expected of them- especially to live up to cultural images of what it means to be a man” (81).  This is happening in this photo because it two shops, of several, that share in the idea of what a women looks like and should do.  So, women that shop at Surrey Center are able to work out, buy, their exercise outfit, and get an artificial acquired tan in one quick trip.  This is present, I think, in most shopping areas.  There are images of what we are supposed to look like and there are the stores that sell the clothing that will make us look the way we a socially suppose to.  If your body type does not fit that ideal or your skin is too light or too dark there are products and services that will help you reach the ideal.  
This is a photo of the sign for Surrey Tavern.  It is used to represent sexism.  Ferber et al. defines sexism as “a system that oppresses women through everyday practices, attitudes, assumptions, behaviors, culture, and institutional rules and structures” (557).  I used this image because of information that was previously shared with me.  I was informed that on Thursdays, in August that would be Thirsty Thursday, women are paid to come to this bar.  I was told that it is a rather unpleasant bar with a drab atmosphere and is not high recommended, but on Thirsty Thursday the drink are cheap and females are paid five dollars upon entering the bar.  I think that this is an example of sexism since men are not paid and it is basically assumed by the manager or owner of the tavern that it would be necessary to pay women to frequent the establishment.  If in reality paying women to come to a bar where drinks are cheap and many of the men will be fairly to highly intoxicated as well as willing to purchase drinks for women, it would seem that there are issues with the “attitudes, assumptions, behaviors, and culture” of the customers and the tavern.



View Larger Map">